Marketdash

When Good News Isn't Good Enough: Nvidia's Post-Earnings Drop Has Bears Drawing Dot-Com Parallels

MarketDash
Nvidia shares fell sharply after a record-breaking quarter, prompting market veterans to recall a painful historical pattern and question whether AI's poster child is sending a warning signal.

Get Cisco Systems Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

Here's a funny thing about the stock market: sometimes, a company can do everything right and still get punished. That's the confusing situation Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) found itself in on Thursday. The chipmaker reported what analysts universally called a blowout fourth quarter, with revenue soaring 73% year-over-year to $68.1 billion and guidance for the current quarter smashing expectations. And yet, the stock tumbled 5.46% to close at $184.89. For some, that disconnect isn't just noise—it's a very loud, very familiar alarm bell.

The Dot-Com Déjà Vu Playbook

Lawrence McDonald, founder of The Bear Traps Report, took to social media to spell it out. "Off 5% on the 'blowout quarter' — anyone that lived through the dotcom bust will tell you, the Nasdaq puked lower in March 2000 on great news. It's NOT the headline, it's the market's response that matters," he posted. He followed up with a blunt reminder: "Stocks down on good news, always remember."

Think about that for a second. The thesis is simple but powerful. At a market top, the fundamentals can look fantastic—earnings are great, guidance is strong, the future is bright. But if the stock price starts falling anyway, it suggests that all the good news was already priced in, and maybe then some. The buyers are exhausted. McDonald had previously noted that Nvidia's stock had gone essentially nowhere since October even as other "hard assets" rallied, quipping, "Lord pump master is losing his touch :)"

A Specific and Painful Blueprint

McDonald's reference isn't vague nostalgia; it's a specific, painful historical blueprint. The Nasdaq Composite Index peaked at 5,048.62 on March 10, 2000. What followed was a brutal, multi-year collapse that erased trillions in market value, with the index not reclaiming that high until 2015. The peak didn't come on bad news; it came when optimism was highest. The subsequent fall began even as companies reported strong results. That's the parallel that has bears smelling blood in the water today.

Get Cisco Systems Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS (optional)

The Bears Circle with a Big Short Veteran

McDonald isn't a lone voice. Noted contrarian investor Michael Burry—famous for betting against the housing bubble before the 2008 crash—has also raised a red flag. He zeroed in on a specific line in Nvidia's financials: purchase obligations. These are commitments to buy goods from suppliers in the future. Nvidia's purchase obligations skyrocketed to $95.2 billion, up from $16.1 billion a year ago.

To Burry, this isn't just growth; it's a potential warning sign. In a recent newsletter, he drew a direct parallel to Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) in 2000. Back then, Cisco was the undisputed king of the internet infrastructure boom, and its massive order backlog was seen as a sign of incredible demand. When the bubble popped, that backlog evaporated, and the stock cratered. "This is not business as usual. This is risk," Burry wrote. The implication is clear: surging commitments can signal a company is over-ordering in anticipation of demand that may not materialize, leaving it exposed if the AI hype cycle cools.

The Bulls Dig In Their Heels

Of course, not everyone is buying the doom-and-gloom narrative. The bullish case for Nvidia remains firmly intact among many analysts. Goldman Sachs analyst James Schneider reiterated a Buy rating on Thursday with a $250 price target, arguing Nvidia has a "clearer path" to outperform. "We see Nvidia accelerating its growth profile in 2026 while maintaining a competitive edge in the market," Schneider said.

The numbers support the bull case unequivocally. A 73% revenue jump is staggering. Even more impressive was the company's guidance for the current quarter: $78 billion in revenue, which blew past the average Wall Street estimate of around $72 billion. In a normal market, those are the kind of numbers that send a stock soaring 10% or more. The fact that it didn't is the entire crux of the debate.

Where Does This Leave Investors?

So, what do you have? On one side, you have arguably the most successful company of the AI era, firing on all cylinders and forecasting even more massive growth. On the other side, you have a stock that sold off hard on that news, prompting seasoned market watchers to invoke the ghost of the most infamous bubble in modern history.

The price action tells the story of this tension. After Thursday's 5.46% drop to $184.89, the weakness continued into Friday's premarket, with shares dipping another 0.54% to around $183.89. The market is literally voting with its dollars, and right now, a significant cohort is voting "sell" despite the stellar report card.

This is the essence of a market inflection point. It's not about what just happened; it's about what happens next. The bulls believe Nvidia's fundamentals are so strong they will eventually overwhelm any skepticism. The bears believe the market's tepid reaction to phenomenal news is the first crack in the dam—a sign that the AI trade has become too crowded, too optimistic, and is due for a reality check. Only time will tell which narrative wins, but for now, the battle lines are drawn, and the echoes of 2000 are growing louder.

When Good News Isn't Good Enough: Nvidia's Post-Earnings Drop Has Bears Drawing Dot-Com Parallels

MarketDash
Nvidia shares fell sharply after a record-breaking quarter, prompting market veterans to recall a painful historical pattern and question whether AI's poster child is sending a warning signal.

Get Cisco Systems Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

Here's a funny thing about the stock market: sometimes, a company can do everything right and still get punished. That's the confusing situation Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) found itself in on Thursday. The chipmaker reported what analysts universally called a blowout fourth quarter, with revenue soaring 73% year-over-year to $68.1 billion and guidance for the current quarter smashing expectations. And yet, the stock tumbled 5.46% to close at $184.89. For some, that disconnect isn't just noise—it's a very loud, very familiar alarm bell.

The Dot-Com Déjà Vu Playbook

Lawrence McDonald, founder of The Bear Traps Report, took to social media to spell it out. "Off 5% on the 'blowout quarter' — anyone that lived through the dotcom bust will tell you, the Nasdaq puked lower in March 2000 on great news. It's NOT the headline, it's the market's response that matters," he posted. He followed up with a blunt reminder: "Stocks down on good news, always remember."

Think about that for a second. The thesis is simple but powerful. At a market top, the fundamentals can look fantastic—earnings are great, guidance is strong, the future is bright. But if the stock price starts falling anyway, it suggests that all the good news was already priced in, and maybe then some. The buyers are exhausted. McDonald had previously noted that Nvidia's stock had gone essentially nowhere since October even as other "hard assets" rallied, quipping, "Lord pump master is losing his touch :)"

A Specific and Painful Blueprint

McDonald's reference isn't vague nostalgia; it's a specific, painful historical blueprint. The Nasdaq Composite Index peaked at 5,048.62 on March 10, 2000. What followed was a brutal, multi-year collapse that erased trillions in market value, with the index not reclaiming that high until 2015. The peak didn't come on bad news; it came when optimism was highest. The subsequent fall began even as companies reported strong results. That's the parallel that has bears smelling blood in the water today.

Get Cisco Systems Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS (optional)

The Bears Circle with a Big Short Veteran

McDonald isn't a lone voice. Noted contrarian investor Michael Burry—famous for betting against the housing bubble before the 2008 crash—has also raised a red flag. He zeroed in on a specific line in Nvidia's financials: purchase obligations. These are commitments to buy goods from suppliers in the future. Nvidia's purchase obligations skyrocketed to $95.2 billion, up from $16.1 billion a year ago.

To Burry, this isn't just growth; it's a potential warning sign. In a recent newsletter, he drew a direct parallel to Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) in 2000. Back then, Cisco was the undisputed king of the internet infrastructure boom, and its massive order backlog was seen as a sign of incredible demand. When the bubble popped, that backlog evaporated, and the stock cratered. "This is not business as usual. This is risk," Burry wrote. The implication is clear: surging commitments can signal a company is over-ordering in anticipation of demand that may not materialize, leaving it exposed if the AI hype cycle cools.

The Bulls Dig In Their Heels

Of course, not everyone is buying the doom-and-gloom narrative. The bullish case for Nvidia remains firmly intact among many analysts. Goldman Sachs analyst James Schneider reiterated a Buy rating on Thursday with a $250 price target, arguing Nvidia has a "clearer path" to outperform. "We see Nvidia accelerating its growth profile in 2026 while maintaining a competitive edge in the market," Schneider said.

The numbers support the bull case unequivocally. A 73% revenue jump is staggering. Even more impressive was the company's guidance for the current quarter: $78 billion in revenue, which blew past the average Wall Street estimate of around $72 billion. In a normal market, those are the kind of numbers that send a stock soaring 10% or more. The fact that it didn't is the entire crux of the debate.

Where Does This Leave Investors?

So, what do you have? On one side, you have arguably the most successful company of the AI era, firing on all cylinders and forecasting even more massive growth. On the other side, you have a stock that sold off hard on that news, prompting seasoned market watchers to invoke the ghost of the most infamous bubble in modern history.

The price action tells the story of this tension. After Thursday's 5.46% drop to $184.89, the weakness continued into Friday's premarket, with shares dipping another 0.54% to around $183.89. The market is literally voting with its dollars, and right now, a significant cohort is voting "sell" despite the stellar report card.

This is the essence of a market inflection point. It's not about what just happened; it's about what happens next. The bulls believe Nvidia's fundamentals are so strong they will eventually overwhelm any skepticism. The bears believe the market's tepid reaction to phenomenal news is the first crack in the dam—a sign that the AI trade has become too crowded, too optimistic, and is due for a reality check. Only time will tell which narrative wins, but for now, the battle lines are drawn, and the echoes of 2000 are growing louder.