So, the President gives his State of the Union address, lays out his vision, and then... everyone else gets to say what they really think about it. This year, Vice President Kamala Harris didn't wait long to offer her review, and let's just say she's not giving it five stars.

In an interview Wednesday, Harris called President Donald Trump's speech "full of lies" and had a simple, one-word rebuttal to his declaration that the state of the union is strong: "Absolutely not." Her reasoning? The economic picture looks very different from the ground up. "So many are suffering under the weight of high prices, unaffordable health care, unaffordable housing," she said. She pointed to a proposed $1 trillion cut to Medicaid, contrasting it with tax relief she argued favors wealthy Americans. "Who's it roaring for?" Harris asked, directly challenging Trump's description of a booming economy.

But her critique went beyond the balance sheet. Harris took aim at the SAVE Act, which Trump urged Congress to pass. She argued it would require documents like birth certificates or passports to register to vote, calling it an effort "to suppress and obstruct the ability of people to vote." On the world stage, she warned against the risks of escalating tensions with Iran amid a major U.S. military buildup in the Middle East. "The American people do not want another war," she said, also accusing the President of weakening alliances, including NATO.

The Democratic Chorus: A Litany of Complaints

Harris wasn't singing solo. A whole ensemble of Democratic leaders took to social media and statements to harmonize on similar themes, creating a post-SOTU counter-narrative focused on what they saw as glaring omissions and misguided priorities.

The common thread? A belief that the speech missed the mark on kitchen-table issues. Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) said Trump "is distracted" and "has no real plan to bring prices down." Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) did the math, arguing that Trump devoted "less than 3 minutes on affordability and less than 4 minutes on health care," suggesting a misalignment with what Americans are worrying about.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) offered perhaps the most colorful review, saying "Trump congratulated himself" rather than offering solutions. He called it "not America's State of the Union, it was Donald Trump's state of delusion."

On policy, the criticism was specific. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) framed Trump's economic agenda as "a giant tax cut for rich people" paid for by cuts to programs like Medicaid, resulting in "higher costs and less money for you." Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) echoed Harris's foreign policy concerns, warning against war with Iran. "Nobody has explained how a war with Iran helps America, because it won't," he said, citing the toll of past conflicts.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton brought the focus back to voting, criticizing Republicans for "trying to make it harder for millions of Americans to vote — especially married women," and urged resistance to new restrictions.

The Republican Refrain: Celebrating a 'Historic' Year

Of course, on the other side of the aisle, the reviews were glowing. For Republicans, the speech was a victory lap for a successful first year back in office.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) framed it as a "transformational and historic" success, claiming, "Inflation’s down, wages are up, investment is booming, the GDP is exceeding every expectation." He said Republicans delivered on "promises made, promises kept" and took a shot at Democrats for boycotting the address, calling it "shameful."

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) called President Trump's speech "bold, optimistic, and forward-looking," describing the past year as one of major policy victories. Sen. J.D. Vance praised the address as historic, highlighting the administration's focus on prioritizing American citizens over illegal immigrants, which he contrasted with what he described as Washington's often misplaced priorities.

So there you have it. One speech, two completely different realities. One side sees a nation suffering from high costs and dangerous foreign policy; the other sees an economic boom and promises kept. The State of the Union address is always as much about politics as policy, and the immediate reaction tells you exactly where the battle lines are drawn for the year ahead. The debate isn't just about what was said, but about whose description of America you believe.