So, Tesla Inc. (TSLA) is taking the California Department of Motor Vehicles to court. The electric vehicle giant isn't happy about being labeled a "false advertiser" for how it markets its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) features. This comes after Tesla already removed the "Autopilot" term from its marketing in the state, but apparently, that wasn't the end of the story.
According to court filings from February 13, Tesla's lawyers are firing back. They claim the DMV "wrongfully and baselessly" slapped the false advertiser tag on the company. "The DMV Order is deeply flawed," the filing states. The core of Tesla's argument? The agency didn't actually prove that customers were confused about what Autopilot and FSD can and cannot do.
"DMV presented no consumer witnesses and instead relied almost entirely on the testimony of a single law professor," the filing says. Tesla insists it has been clear that these are driver-assistance systems—they don't make the car autonomous. You're still supposed to pay attention and keep your hands on the wheel. The company's legal team is essentially asking: where's the evidence that people didn't understand that?
It's a Legal Two-Way Street
This lawsuit is Tesla's counterpunch in an ongoing regulatory fight. The California DMV had previously sued Tesla, alleging the company misled consumers about its systems' capabilities. That lawsuit sought a pretty serious penalty: a 30-day suspension of Tesla's sales and manufacturing operations in California.
A court did rule in the DMV's favor, but the agency didn't pull the trigger on the suspension. Instead, it gave Tesla a 90-day window to clean up its marketing act. Tesla complied, avoided the shutdown, but now it's challenging the very foundation of the DMV's case.












