Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) isn't buying President Donald Trump's pitch to let Republicans "nationalize" elections. The libertarian-leaning senator says it clashes with the Constitution and the longstanding principle that states run their own voting systems.
Rand Paul Tells Trump Federal Election Takeover Isn't Constitutional
Get Market Alerts
Weekly insights + SMS alerts
Trump Wants Federal Republicans Running Elections
During a Monday podcast appearance with former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, Trump floated the idea that Republicans should seize control of election administration at the federal level, targeting what he described as corrupt jurisdictions.
"The Republicans should say, 'We want to take over,'" Trump said, arguing federal involvement is needed in "at least many — 15 places."
Constitutional Problems With the Plan
Paul wasn't having it. Speaking with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle on Tuesday, he explained why Trump's proposal doesn't work legally.
"That's not what the Constitution says about elections," Paul said. While the Supreme Court can enforce uniform rules on certain voting matters, "as far as the time, place and manner of elections, that, under the Constitution, is a state activity."
Paul pointed out the irony: Republicans blocked similar nationalization efforts when Democrats tried under former President Biden. "I was against Nancy Pelosi's bill, which would have nationalized it, but I would also be against any bill coming from this administration that would nationalize elections," he said.
Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) sided with Paul on keeping elections decentralized, though his reasoning was more practical than constitutional. "I think it's harder to hack 50 election systems than it is to hack one," Thune said, while still supporting voter ID requirements.
Both Parties Say No
The pushback wasn't just from Republicans. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called Trump's idea illegal and raised concerns about his respect for democratic principles.
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) also rejected federal control, emphasizing that state-led oversight is the proper way to ensure secure, constitutional elections.
More News

Oil Breaks $100 on Iran Strike Fears as Energy ETF XLE Hits an All-Time Record

The Average Stock Is Crushing the S&P 500 by the Most Since 2009: Is the Rotation Just Getting Started?

Tech-to-Defensive Rotation, GM Stock Logs Worst Week Since 2023: This Week on Wall Street

Trump Loosens 50% Canada Tariffs Days Before Midterms as Susan Collins Fights for Her Seat

First Russian Diesel Tanker Heads to New York Under Trump-Putin Deal as Fuel Prices Stay High

American Express Lifts Profit Outlook, But 3,500 Layoffs and a $350 Million Penalty Steal the Show

The $1.3 Trillion Equity Rush: Record Flows, but the Money Is Moving Around

TSMC Stock Climbs As Moody's Hands Out An Upgrade And The Chipmaker Quietly Rethinks Rare Earths
Get Market News Alerts
Real-time alerts on price moves, news, and trading opportunities.
Join 20,000+ investors. No spam, ever.
Featured Articles
View all news
Oil Breaks $100 on Iran Strike Fears as Energy ETF XLE Hits an All-Time Record

The Average Stock Is Crushing the S&P 500 by the Most Since 2009: Is the Rotation Just Getting Started?

Tech-to-Defensive Rotation, GM Stock Logs Worst Week Since 2023: This Week on Wall Street

Trump Loosens 50% Canada Tariffs Days Before Midterms as Susan Collins Fights for Her Seat

First Russian Diesel Tanker Heads to New York Under Trump-Putin Deal as Fuel Prices Stay High

American Express Lifts Profit Outlook, But 3,500 Layoffs and a $350 Million Penalty Steal the Show

The $1.3 Trillion Equity Rush: Record Flows, but the Money Is Moving Around






