Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) isn't buying President Donald Trump's pitch to let Republicans "nationalize" elections. The libertarian-leaning senator says it clashes with the Constitution and the longstanding principle that states run their own voting systems.
Rand Paul Tells Trump Federal Election Takeover Isn't Constitutional
Get Market Alerts
Weekly insights + SMS alerts
Trump Wants Federal Republicans Running Elections
During a Monday podcast appearance with former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, Trump floated the idea that Republicans should seize control of election administration at the federal level, targeting what he described as corrupt jurisdictions.
"The Republicans should say, 'We want to take over,'" Trump said, arguing federal involvement is needed in "at least many — 15 places."
Constitutional Problems With the Plan
Paul wasn't having it. Speaking with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle on Tuesday, he explained why Trump's proposal doesn't work legally.
"That's not what the Constitution says about elections," Paul said. While the Supreme Court can enforce uniform rules on certain voting matters, "as far as the time, place and manner of elections, that, under the Constitution, is a state activity."
Paul pointed out the irony: Republicans blocked similar nationalization efforts when Democrats tried under former President Biden. "I was against Nancy Pelosi's bill, which would have nationalized it, but I would also be against any bill coming from this administration that would nationalize elections," he said.
Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) sided with Paul on keeping elections decentralized, though his reasoning was more practical than constitutional. "I think it's harder to hack 50 election systems than it is to hack one," Thune said, while still supporting voter ID requirements.
Both Parties Say No
The pushback wasn't just from Republicans. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called Trump's idea illegal and raised concerns about his respect for democratic principles.
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) also rejected federal control, emphasizing that state-led oversight is the proper way to ensure secure, constitutional elections.
More News

Markets Rise as U.S. and Iran Hit Pause on Strikes; Big Tech Earnings and Fed Decision Loom

Trump Admin to Pump $1 Billion into this "Off-the-Radar" AI Stock

Oil Tumbles and Stocks Rise as Trump Gives Iran Diplomacy 'Some Space'

Iran Says It Won't Let the US Dictate the War's Pace, Strait of Hormuz Stays Closed

Trump’s Tariff Gambit Puts Canadian Oil in the Crosshairs—and U.S. Gas Prices on the Line

Your Download Link (Expiring)

Sen. John Kennedy Warns Trump's Saudi Nuclear Deal Sends Wrong Signal Amid Iran Tensions: 'The World Is on a Hair Trigger'

Apple's AI Strategy Is a High-Stakes Bet—and One Analyst Thinks It's Wrong
Get Market News Alerts
Real-time alerts on price moves, news, and trading opportunities.
Join 20,000+ investors. No spam, ever.
Featured Articles
View all news
Markets Rise as U.S. and Iran Hit Pause on Strikes; Big Tech Earnings and Fed Decision Loom

Trump Admin to Pump $1 Billion into this "Off-the-Radar" AI Stock (Ad)

Oil Tumbles and Stocks Rise as Trump Gives Iran Diplomacy 'Some Space'

Iran Says It Won't Let the US Dictate the War's Pace, Strait of Hormuz Stays Closed

Trump’s Tariff Gambit Puts Canadian Oil in the Crosshairs—and U.S. Gas Prices on the Line

Have you tried Elon Musk’s 70X AI agent? (Ad)

Sen. John Kennedy Warns Trump's Saudi Nuclear Deal Sends Wrong Signal Amid Iran Tensions: 'The World Is on a Hair Trigger'






