So, former President Donald Trump has a new demand for Iran: total, complete, "unconditional surrender." He laid it out in a Truth Social post on Friday, following up on his earlier call for the U.S. to have a direct hand in choosing Iran's next leader. The plan, as he described it, is surrender first, then "the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s)," after which the U.S. and allies would help rebuild Iran's economy. It's a bold, maximalist opening position for a hypothetical negotiation.

Iranian officials, as you might expect, were not impressed. They pushed back directly and with some colorful language. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf took to X to clarify that Iran's future "will be determined solely by the proud Iranian nation, not by Epstein's gang." That's a pretty definitive no.

The rejection got even more personal from Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh. Speaking at an event in New Delhi, he dismissed Trump's influence, saying the former president "cannot appoint even the mayor of New York." He also framed the broader U.S.-Israel position as an "existential war" for Tehran, leaving Iran "no option" but to fight back. That's not the language of a regime looking to make a deal.

This fiery response came after Trump's comments on Thursday, where he criticized Mojtaba Khamenei—a frontrunner to be Iran's next Supreme Leader—as inexperienced. Trump likened the situation to his past strategy regarding Venezuela, suggesting a similar playbook of pressure and demanding political change. Tehran's message in return is clear: they'll pick their own leaders, thank you very much, and they see this as a fight for their survival.