So, about that global tariff. Remember on Saturday when it was going to be 15%? Well, as of Tuesday morning, it's actually going to be 10%. U.S. Customs and Border Protection made it official: a 10% tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 kicks in at 12:01 a.m. on Tuesday for all goods that aren't exempt.
This 10% rate was what President Trump announced on Friday and formalized through an Executive Order. The administration also rolled out a list of exemptions covering a broad range of products, plus certain imports from Canada and Mexico. Notably, there's been no directive signed to implement that tougher 15% rate that was floated just days ago. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from MarketDash.
Why the Sudden Shift from 15% to 10%?
It probably has something to do with the loud and immediate objections from some of America's biggest trading partners. The higher 15% rate faced significant resistance, particularly from the European Union and the United Kingdom.
On Monday, the UK government warned that "nothing is off the table" in response to higher U.S. tariffs. While the prime minister's office suggested core parts of the UK-U.S. trade deal—covering things like cars, steel, and pharmaceuticals—were unlikely to change, they called the situation "evolving" and confirmed talks are ongoing.
The EU, for its part, urged the U.S. to respect its trade agreements and provide "full clarity." The bloc also hit pause on ratifying its August trade deal in parliament, a clear signal of displeasure.
Other partners moved quickly to protect their interests. Taiwan's Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun stated the government is in close contact with U.S. officials to ensure its recently negotiated preferential trade terms remain intact following the Supreme Court's decision.
Perhaps in response to this global unease, President Trump issued a warning on his Truth Social platform on Monday. He stated that any country trying to exploit the recent Supreme Court ruling as a loophole to break out of trade agreements would face "much higher" retaliatory tariffs.













